![]() Sadly, we encountered far too many glitches, and more often than not, the service failed to deliver. References: Do all archival references that should have a DOI list one (e.g. Easy PDF sounds great on paper - a service you can use from any device to convert between formats.Authors: Does the paper.md file include a list of authors with their affiliations?.Community guidelines: Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support.Easy way to annotate your PDF online DOCX Editor Edit DOCX files online without Word Redact PDF. Automated tests: Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the function of the software can be verified? Securely edit your PDF online Annotate PDF.Functionality documentation: Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?.Example usage: Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).Installation instructions: Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.A statement of need: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?.Performance: If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.).Functionality: Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?.Installation: Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?.Authorship: Has the submitting author ( made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?.Version: Does the release version given match the GitHub release (v.0.0.2)?.License: Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE file with the contents of an OSI approved software license?.Repository: Is the source code for this software available at the repository url?.I confirm that I read and will adhere to the JOSS code of conduct.As the reviewer I confirm that I have read the JOSS conflict of interest policy and that there are no conflicts of interest for me to review this work.Easy cloud sharing and further PDF editing. ✨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks ✨ Review checklist for Conflict of interest Convert Microsoft Excel workbooks to PDF with a user-friendly interface in a single click completely for free. The reviewer guidelines are available here. Be sure to accept the invite at this URL:.Make sure you're logged in to your GitHub account.(For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.) Reviewer instructions & please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |